Explorando tendencias del devenir público: cienciometría y revisión sistemática
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El avance de la modernidad torna imperativo asegurar el adecuado funcionamiento de los servicios gubernamentales y la efectiva implementación de políticas y programas para garantizar la sostenibilidad de la ciudadanía. El objetivo de esta investigación fue proporcionar un análisis exhaustivo de las tendencias actuales, vacíos temáticos y áreas de investigación futura en administración y gestión pública. Para lograr ello, se llevó a cabo un análisis cienciométrico y una revisión sistemática de literatura sobre la última producción en Scopus, durante los últimos cinco años. Los hallazgos revelan que la producción actual presenta una tendencia al alza. Se identificaron tres categorías de tendencias: consolidadas, intermedias y emergentes. Entre las tendencias consolidadas se destacaron términos como gobernanza, transparencia, corrupción, gobierno electrónico y sostenibilidad. Las tendencias emergentes contemplan: salud pública, big data, gobierno abierto, transformación digital y ciudades inteligentes. También se reveló la importancia de una gobernanza efectiva y participación ciudadana en salud y, la adopción estratégica de tecnologías para mejorar la eficiencia operativa y prestación de servicios gubernamentales personalizados. En futuros trabajos, se recomienda el estudio en las tendencias emergentes, intermedias o vacíos temáticos identificados, tales como la colaboración público-privada e internacional en el desarrollo de una gobernanza sostenible, difusión y prevención salud en comunidades en estado de vulnerabilidad o, el impacto de las TIC en logro de resultados en países en desarrollo.
Detalles del artículo
La Revista Universitas-XX1 se alinea con los principios de acceso abierto y colaboración académica al adoptar la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Esta licencia garantiza que los contenidos publicados puedan ser utilizados y compartidos ampliamente bajo las siguientes condiciones:
Atribución: Los autores y la revista deben ser reconocidos adecuadamente como los creadores del contenido original, proporcionando la referencia completa y el enlace correspondiente a la publicación.
Uso no comercial: Los contenidos no pueden ser utilizados con fines comerciales, preservando su propósito académico y educativo. Compartir igual: Las obras derivadas deben distribuirse bajo los mismos términos de esta licencia, fomentando la creación de conocimiento accesible y equitativo.
Al implementar esta licencia, la Revista Universitas-XXI refuerza su compromiso con la difusión de investigaciones de calidad, el acceso libre al conocimiento y la promoción de un entorno colaborativo entre investigadores, docentes y estudiantes de todo el mundo.
Esta decisión refleja los valores fundamentales de responsabilidad, ética y transparencia en el ámbito académico, asegurando que los aportes intelectuales sirvan como base para nuevas investigaciones y proyectos, respetando los derechos de los autores y de la comunidad científica.
Para más información sobre esta licencia, puede consultar el siguiente enlace: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Referencias
Adomaviciute, D. 2018. University’s role and influence for professional development in public administration area. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, 703-719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0360-1
Alcaide, C., Alcaide, L. y Rodríguez, M. 2022. Strategic alignment of open government initiatives in Andalusia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 00208523221086125. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221086125
Appe, S., Rubaii, N. y Whigham, K. 2021. Expanding the reach of representativeness, discretion, and collaboration: The unrealized potential of public administration research in atrocity prevention. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13296
Aranibar, E., Huachani, D. y Zúñiga, M. 2022. Emprendimiento femenino en el Perú: puntos fuertes y débiles para su sostenibilidad en el tiempo. Fides et Ratio, 23(23), 199-224. https://doi.org/10.55739/fer.v23i23.115
Battisti, A., Valese, M. y Natta, H. 2022. Indicators as Mediators for Environmental Decision Making: The Case Study of Alessandria. Land, 11(5), 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050607
Biscione, A. y Muco, K. 2021. The impact of corruption and good governance on the economic growth of the Balkan countries. Transition Studies Review, 28(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.14665/1614-4007-28-2-005
Boffardi, R. 2022. How efficient is the Italian health system? Evidence on the role of political-institutional dynamics. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 84, 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101388
Boudreau, C. 2021. Reuse of open data in Quebec: from economic development to government transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(4), 855-869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319884628
Caldas, R. 2021. Providencias sanitárias de financas públicas e tributárias federais pátrias em tempos de deflagracao de pandemia: Um retrato do endividamento público em meio a necessidade de preservacao do sistema de saúde e retomada economica. Revista Jurídica 64(2), 71-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v2i64.5102
Capasso, S., Cicatiello, L., De Simone, E. y Santoro, L. 2022. Corruption and tax revenues: evidence from Italian regions. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 93(4), 1129-1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12356
Castillo, C., Viu-Roig, M. y Alvarez-Palau, E. 2022. COVID-19 lockdown as an opportunity to rethink urban freight distribution: Lessons from the Barcelona metropolitan area. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14, 100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100605
Cevallos, M., Blacio, G. y Maldonado, J. 2022. Indicios sobre el estado situacional de la descentralización en Ecuador. Revista Derecho del Estado, (51), 167-195. https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n51.06
Corburn, J., Vlahov, D., Mberu, B., Riley, L., Caiaffa, W., Rashid, S., Ko, A., Patel, S., Jukur, S., Martínez, E., Jayasinghe, S., ... y Ayad, H. 2020. Slum health: arresting COVID-19 and improving well-being in urban informal settlements. Journal of urban health, 97, 348-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00438-6
Dolamore, S. 2021. Detecting empathy in public organizations: Creating a more relational public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(1), 58-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1700458
Donina, D. y Paleari, S. 2019. New public management: global reform script or conceptual stretching? Analysis of university governance structures in the Napoleonic administrative tradition. Higher Education, 78, 193-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0338-y
Elliott, I., Bottom, K., Carmichael, P., Liddle, J., Martin, S. y Pyper, R. 2022. The fragmentation of public administration: Differentiated and decentered governance in the (dis)United Kingdom. Public Administration, 100(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12803
Fleischer, J. y Reiners, N. 2021. Connecting international relations and public administration: Toward a joint research agenda for the study of international bureaucracy. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1230-1247. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa097
Ford, M. 2021. Considering social equity in a new public management reform: Evidence from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Public Integrity, 23(4), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1908730
Gabarro, C. 2021. Entre tri gestionnaire et tri professionnel: Réorientation et éviction des pauvres à l’Assurance maladie. Sociétés contemporaines, 123(3), 79-109. https://doi.org/10.3917/soco.123.0079
Gatto, A. y Sadik, E. 2022. Governance matters. Fieldwork on participatory budgeting, voting, and development from Campania, Italy. Journal of Public Affairs, 22, e2769. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2769
Goncalves, R. y Domingos, I. 2021. Blockchain governance: Disruptive technology for controlling corruption in public health. Revista Juridica, 31-49. https://doi.org/10.21902/revistajur.2316-753X.v4i66.5065
Greer, S., King, E., da Fonseca, E. y Peralta, A. 2020. The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Global public health, 15(9), 1413-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1783340
Hue, T. y Tung-Wen, M. 2022. Democratic governance: Examining the Influence of citizen participation on local government performance in Vietnam. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1939713
Kapoor, K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. y Nerur, S. 2018. Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 531-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9810-y
Kim, M. y Charbonneau, É. 2020. Caught between volunteerism and professionalism: Support by nonprofit leaders for the donative labor hypothesis. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(2), 327-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18816139
Kim, P. 2021. South Koreas fast response to coronavirus disease: implications on public policy and public management theory. Public Management Review, 23(12), 1736-1747. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1766266
Lanzaro, J. y Ramos, C. 2021. Decentralization and co-participation in the public sector: a historical feature of Uruguayan pluralist democracy. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1750029
Longo, J. 2022. When artificial intelligence meets real public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 65(2), 384-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12465
Lund, C. 2022. Professional Development Leadership in Public Organizations: A Refined Conceptualization. Public Personnel Management, 51(4), 516-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260221118576
Macedo, S., Valadares, J., Mendes, W. y Miranda, M. 2022. Perceptions on Access to Information and Corruption in Municipal Public Management: Two Sides of the Same Coin. Brazilian Journal of Public Policy, 12, 59. https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v12i3.7901
Mahmood, H., Hassan, S., Tanveer, M. y Furqan, M. 2022. Rule of law, control of corruption and CO2 emissions in Pakistan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(4), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13098
Mangia, C., Ferretto, G., Russo, A., Cervino, M. y Portaluri, M. 2022. Participation and facilitation in environment and health contexts: The case study of San Donaci. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, 46(5-6), 382-386. https://doi.org/10.19191/ep22.5-6.a563.099
McMullin, C. 2021. Challenging the necessity of New Public Governance: Co-production by third sector organizations under different models of public management. Public Administration, 99(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12672
Mériade, L. y Rochette, C. 2022. Governance tensions in the healthcare sector: a contrasting case study in France. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07401-4
Mykytyuk, P., Semenets-Orlova, I., Blishchuk, K., Skoryk, H., Pidlisna, T. y Trebyk, L. 2021. Outsourcing as a tool of strategic planning in public administration. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i3.4718
Nicolaescu, A. y López, F. 2021. External vs. governmental auditing: insights from Spain. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 17(3-4), 276-299. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2021.121499
ONeill, M. 2022a. Introduction: Special issue on curriculum design in public administration education: Challenges and perspectives. Teaching Public Administration, 40(3), 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394221103954
ONeill, M. 2022b. MPA/MPP programmes and the future of work: Does MPA curriculum align with civil service requirements. Teaching Public Administration, 40(3), 388-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420984503
Ostransky, J. y Aznar, F. 2021. Investment treaties and national governance in India: Rearrangements, empowerment, and discipline. Leiden Journal of International Law, 34(2), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156521000029
Overton, M., Larson, S., Carlson, L. y Kleinschmit, S. (2022). Public data primacy: the changing landscape of public service delivery as big data gets bigger. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(4), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00052-z
Park, N., Cho, M. y Lee, J. 2021. Building a culture of innovation: How do agency leadership and management systems promote innovative activities within the government? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 80(3), 453-473. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12474
Pecaric, M. 2020. Regulatory cybernetics: adaptability and probability in the public administration’s regulations. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0006
Perez, J. 2021. Digital Planning: A Challenge for Public Administrations. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, 57, 46-46. https://laadministracionaldia.inap.es/noticia.asp?id=1511979
Rezapour, M. y Elmshaeuser, S. 2022. Artificial intelligence-based analytics for impacts of COVID-19 and online learning on college students’ mental health. PLoS One, 17(11), e0276767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276767
Ríos, A., Guillamon, M., Egea-Martínez, J. y Benito, B. 2022. Influye una mayor transparencia en la mejor gestión de los recursos públicos? El ejemplo de los ayuntamientos españoles. CIRIEC-España, (106), 267-298. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.106.18983
Robert, E., Zongo, S., Rajan, D. y Ridde, V. 2022. Contributing to collaborative health governance in Africa: a realist evaluation of the Universal Health Coverage Partnership. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08120-0
Rubaii, N., Whigham, K. y Appe, S. 2021. The public administration imperative of applying an atrocity prevention lens to COVID-19 responses: Leveraging the global pandemic for positive structural change and greater social equity. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(3), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1829260
Salnikova, O., Lagodiienko, V., Ivanchenkova, L., Kopytko, V., Kulak, N. y Usachenko, O. 2019. Evaluation of the effectiveness of implementation blockchain technology in public administration. IJITEE, 8(9), 1710-1713. http://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.I8531.078919
Silva, A., Veiga, A., Cruz, O., Bastos, L. y Gomes, M. 2022. Severe acute respiratory infection surveillance in Brazil: the role of public, private and philanthropic healthcare units. Health Policy and Planning, 37(9), 1075-1085. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czac050
Simonet, D. 2022. Centralization of health policy decisions, conversion to austerity, and public defiance in contemporary France. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4), e2634. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2634
Sousa, M., Cardoso, F., Faria, L., Nacife, J., Barbosa, K. y Cruz, J. 2021. Gestao de Processos no Setor Público: técnicas, ferramentas, lacunas e agenda de pesquisa. RISTI, (E45), 35-56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359402606
Steffek, J. y Wegmann, P. 2021. The standardization of Good Governance in the age of reflexive modernity. Global Studies Quarterly, 1(4), ksab029. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab029
Stentella, D. 2022. Azienda pubblica e finanziamento pubblico dei partiti politici. Azienda pubblica e finanziamento pubblico dei partiti politici, 233-253. https://doi.org/10.3280/EP2022-002002
Sweeting, K. 2022. Strategies to foster engagement, empathy, equity, and ethics in public service: A conceptual model for public and nonprofit administrators. Public Integrity, 24(4-5), 432-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.2014202
Toleikiene, R., Rybnikova, I. y Jukneviciene, V. 2020. Whether and how does the crisis-induced situation change e-leadership in the public sector? Evidence from Lithuanian public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16(SI), 149-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2020.9
Torfing, J., Sorensen, E. y Roiseland, A. 2019. Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795-825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
Tran, Y., Nguyen, N. y Hoang, T. 2022. How do innovation and financial reporting influence public sector performance in a transition market? Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(4), 645-662. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-06-2021-0180
Vallbona, M. 2022. Gobernanza sostenible en los espacios públicos. Cuadernos de Geografía, 31(1), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v31n1.87168
Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G. y Zhu, D. 2018. Public-private partnership in Public Administration discipline: a literature review. Public management review, 20(2), 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1313445
Widanti, N. 2022. Public Service Accountability Approach in Following changes in The New paradigm Of public administration. Res Militaris, 12, 3445-3454. http://repo.unr.ac.id/id/eprint/712
Willems, J., Schmidthuber, L., Vogel, D., Ebinger, F. y Vanderelst, D. 2022. Ethics of robotized public services: The role of robot design and its actions. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101683
Wirtz, B. W., Daiser, P. y Mermann, M. 2018. Social media as a leverage strategy for open government: an exploratory study. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(8), 590-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1289388
Wong, N., Ho, K., Wang, M. y Hsieh, C. 2022. Strong government responses? Reflections on the management of COVID-19 in Hong Kong and Taiwan. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(4), 428-440. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2021-0158
Yang, Y. y Wu, F. 2022. The sustainability of the Project-Driven Innovation of grassroots Governance: Influencing factors and combination paths. Sustainability, 14(24), 16862. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416862