The poisoned public debate and the limits of state regulation: for a digital literacy against the fake news

Main Article Content

Lucas Vianna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3975-7188
Matheus T. Carvalho Mendonça https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1094-1213

Abstract

In addition to the deliberate efforts to distort or misinform, the unintentional errors detected by thepublic —and the suspicion that there may be others not identified— have reinforced a skeptical stanceamong the public about the alleged veracity of the news. In the era of the so-called post-truth, it isno exaggeration to say that the main concern of the social sciences after the public debate has beencompletely hampered by the spread of false news and the supposed beginning of the collapse of liberaldemocracies, has been a collective sensation of shock, indignation. and despair at the increased prevalenceof false news. This paper focuses on the phenomenon of fake news, its effects in the context ofpolitical disputes and regulatory frameworks as an alleged solution. It is intended to demonstrate thatdigital literacy appears as the most adequate solution to mitigate this problem, without affecting freedomof expression in the public discursive sphere.
Abstract 201 | PDF (Español (España)) Downloads 65 HTML (Español (España)) Downloads 22 EPUB (Español (España)) Downloads 4 PDF Downloads 31

References

Almeida, R. de (2019). Bolsonaro Presidente: Conservadorismo, evangelismo ea crise brasileira. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 38(1), 185-213. https://bit.ly/3bTVz6A
Arendt, H. (2014). Entre o passado e o futuro. São Paulo, Perspectiva.
Aufderheide, P. (1990). After the Fairness Doctrine: Controversial Broadcast Programming and the Public Interest. The Journal of Communication, 40(3), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02270.x
Balem, I.F. (2017). O impacto das fake news e o fomento dos discursos de ódio na sociedade em rede: a contribuição da liberdade de expressão na consolidação democrática. 4º Congresso Internacional de Direito e Contemporaneidade. Santa Maria, UFSM.
Barragán, A. (2018). Cinco “fake news” que beneficiaram a candidatura de Bolsonaro.
Jornal Brasil El País. https://bit.ly/35UE4PG
Bobbio, N. (1990). A era dos direitos. Rio de Janeiro, Ed. Campus.
Borges Júnior, E. (2019). What is the post-truth? Elements for a critique of the
concept. Brazilian Journalism Research, 15(3), 524-545. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v15n3.2019.1189
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy. What do young people need to
know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 21-35. https://bit.ly/3isbQ3H
Caponi, S. (2020). Covid-19 no Brasil: entre o negacionismo e a razão neoliberal. Estudos Avançados, 34(99), 209-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2020.3499.013.
Castells, M. (1999). A sociedade em rede. A era da informação: Economia, Sociedade e Cultura. v. 1, 6ª ed. São Paulo, Paz e Terra.
Castells, M. (2018). Ruptura: a crise da democracia liberal. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar.
El País (2016). Papa compara consumo de notícias falsas com comer fezes. https:// bit.ly/3itQXVL
Fisher, M., & Taub, A. (2018). How everyday social media users become real-worldextremists. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/25/world/asia/facebook-extremism.html
Frias-Filho, O. (2018). O que é falso sobre fake news. Revista USP, 116, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.116/issn.2316-9036.v0i116p39-44
Genesini, S. (2018). A pós-verdade é uma notícia falsa. Revista USP, 116, 45-58.https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i116p45-58
Giacoia Júnior, O. (2017). E se o erro, a fabulação, o engano revelarem-se tão essenciaisquanto a verdade? Folha de S. Paulo. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/ilustrissima/2017/02/1859994-e-se-o-erro-a-fabulacao-o-engano-
revelarem-se-tao-essenciais-quanto-a-verdade.shtml
Hazlett, T.W. (1989). The fairness doctrine and the First Amendment. The Public interest, 96, 103-116.
Hazlett, T.W., & Sosa, D.W. (1997). Was the Fairness Doctrine a “Chilling Effect”?
Evidence from the Postderegulation Radio Market. The Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 279-301. https://bit.ly/392W5NM
Hobbs, R. (2017). Teach the Conspiracies. Knowledge Quest, 46(1), 16-24. https://bit.ly/3sTAPC7
Jeong, S.-H., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Media Literacy Interventions: A Meta- Analytic Review. The Journal of Communication, 62(3), 454-472.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x
Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for Democracy in a Partisan Age: Confronting the Challenges of Motivated Reasoning and Misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 3-34. https://doi.
org/10.3102/0002831216679817
Kakutani, M. (2018). The Death of Truth: Notes on Falsehood in the Age of Trump. Danvers, MA, Tim Duggan Books.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Portland, Broadway Books.
McDougall, J., Zezulková, M., Van Driel, B., & Sternadel, D. (2018). Teaching media literacy in Europe: evidence of effective school practices in primary and secondary education. NESET II Report. https://bit.ly/2XSaFRR.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
McIntyre, L. (2019). The Scientific Attitude: Defending Science from Denial, Fraud,and Pseudoscience. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Mesquita, F.L. (2018). A pós-verdade levará à pós-democracia? Revista USP, (16),31-38. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i116p31-38
Miller, A.C. (2016). Confronting Confirmation Bias: Giving Truth a Fighting Chance in the Information Age. Social Education, 80(5), 276-279. https://bit.ly/3is52TO
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C.J., & McNeal, R.S. (2007). Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Oxford. Oxford Word of the Year (2016). Oxford Languages. https://bit.ly/2M0GLIm
Park, R.E. (1940). News as a Form of Knowledge: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. The American Journal of Sociology, 45(5), 669-686. https://bit.ly/39LqlvI
Reale, G., & Antiseri, D. (2014). Storia della filosofia. Dai presocratici ad Aristotele. vol. 1. Bompiani.
Recuero, R., & Gruzd, A. (2019). Cascatas de Fake News Políticas: um estudo de caso no Twitter. Galáxia (São Paulo), 41, 31-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-25542019239035
Rosenzweig, A. (2017). Understanding and Undermining Fake News from the Classroom. Berkeley Review of Education, 7(1), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.5070/B87136743
Souza, E.B.; & Pinheiro, V.S. (2016). Democracia e Liberdade de Expressão: O pluralismo julgado pelo Utilitarismo de Mill e pelo Liberalismo de Rawls. Revista Thesis Juris, 5(1), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.5585/rtj.v5i1.315
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Echo chambers: Bush v. Gore, impeachment, and beyond. Princeton, Princeton University Press
Tambini, D. (2017) Fake news: public policy responses. LSE Media Policy Project Series. Damian Tambini and Goodman, Emma (eds.), (Media Policy Brief 20). The London School of Economics and Political Science.
https://bit.ly/2LM9Bwm
Vannuchi, C. (2018). O direito à comunicação e os desafios da regulação dos meios no Brasil. Galáxia (São Paulo), 38, 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-2554232145
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Vraga, E.K., & Tully, M. (2016). Effectiveness of a Non-Classroom News Media Literacy Intervention Among Different Undergraduate Populations. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 71(4), 440-452. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077695815623399
Webb, T., & Martin, K. (2012). Evaluation of a Us School-Based Media Literacy Violence Prevention Curriculum on Changes in Knowledge and Critical Thinking Among Adolescents. Journal of Children and Media, 6(4),
430-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.72