Ontology of the present of being a teacher and cyberformationin university teaching
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study/research presents the results of a thesis that is justified by the search for understanding how the subjectivation of the teacher takes place and what processes of cyberformation and modes of subjectivation emerge in contemporary university teaching even in the face of the appeals of cyberculture, contemporary culture mediated by networked technologies and their implications for everyday processes of communication, creation and dissemination of knowledge. The aim of the research is to understand what discursive practices constitute being a teacher and what cyberformation processes result from university teaching that can emancipate subjects in contemporary times. Qualitative, multi-referential and articulated with the methodology of conversation, the research has an archaeogenealogical approach and seeks to create an ontology of the present of being a teacher. The data produced and analyzed in online conversations with twenty-nine teachers working in higher education in licentiate courses on four continents, America, Africa, Europe and Asia, constituted three Categorical Units of Analysis of teachers' discursive practices: virtuality, intersubjectivity and cyberformacivity. Intertwined with the research's theoretical framework, namely Agamben, Ardoino, Arendt, Bruno, Deleuze, Freire, Foucault, Han, Hooks, Lemos, Lévy, Moraes, Morozov, Najmanovich, Nietzsche, Nóvoa, O’Neil, Santaella, Santos Silva, Silva, Vieira Neto e Zuboff, the data revealed clues, pointing to how, in university teaching, being a teacher and the processes of cyberformation can promote principles that foster emancipation and critical technological awareness in subjects.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Alteridad" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
Ardoino, J. (2005). Complejidad y formación: pensar la educación desde uma irada epistemológica. (1a ed.) Buenos Aires: Centro de Publicaciones Educativasy Material Didáctico. (Formación de formadores, 13).
Bruno, A. R. (2021). Formación del profesorado en cultura digital: aprendizaje de adultos, educación abierta, emociones y enseñanza. Salvador: EDUFBA.
Chartier, R. (2019). Entre la memoria y el olvido: las temporalidades de la historia, los medios y las experiencias. Revista brasileira de história da mídia. 8(2), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.26664/issn.2238-5126.8220199838
Deleuze, G. (1992). Conversaciones 1972-1990. Peter Pál Pelbart (Trans.). São Paulo: Editora 34.
Foucault, M. (2008). La arqueología del conocimiento. Luiz Felipe Baeta Neves (Trans.). (7a ed.) Rio de Janeiro: Perícia Forense Universitária. (Campo Teórico).
Freire, P. (2019). Pedagogía del oprimido. (71a ed.) Rio de Janeiro/São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Han, B. (2017). Sociedad del cansancio. Enio Paulo Giachini (Trans.). (2a ed.) Petrópolis: Vozes.
Hooks, B. (2013). Enseñar a transgredir: la educación como práctica de la libertad. Marcelo Brandão Cipolla (Trans.). São Paulo: Editora WMF Martins Fontes.
Lemos, A. (2008). Cibercultura, tecnología y vida social en la cultura contemporánea. (4a ed.) Porto Alegre: Sulina.
Lévy, P. (1999). Cibercultura. Carlos Irineu (Trans.). São Paulo: 34.
Mandel, E. (1982). Capitalismo tardío. Carlos Eduardo Silveira Matos, Regis de Castro Andrade & Dinah de Abreu Azevedo (Trans.). São Paulo: Abril Cultural.
Moraes, M. C. (2008). Ecología del conocimiento: complejidad, transdisciplinariedad y educación - nuevos fundamentos para iluminar nuevas prácticas educativas. São Paulo: Antakarana WHH; Casa Willis Harman.
Nietzsche, F. (1995). Ecce homo: cómo se llega a ser lo que se es. Paulo César de Souza (Trans.). São Paulo: Companha das Letras.
Ribeiro, T., Souza, R., & Sampaio, C. S. (2018). La conversación como metodología de investigación: ¿por qué no?. Rio de Janeiro: Ayvu. (Ciencia e investigación en la colección de preguntas).
Santos, B. S. (2005). La universidad en el siglo XXI: hacia una reforma democrática emancipadora de la universidad. (2a ed.) São Paulo: Cortez. (Colección Preguntas de Nuestra tiempo; v.120).
______. (2020). A Cruel Pedagogia do Vírus. Coimbra: Almedina.
Zuboff, S. (2020). La era del capitalismo de vigilancia: la lucha por un futuro humano en la nueva frontera del poder. George Schlesinger (Trans.). (1a ed.) Rio de Janeiro: Intrínseca.
Vieira Neto, O. S. S. (2013). Los significados de la formación humana en la cibercultura: múltiples visiones de investigadores sobre la subjetivación adulta en la cultura digital. (Disertación de Maestria). Universidad Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brasil. https://repositorio.ufjf.br/jspui/handle/ufjf/1214