Teacher knowledge: insights for continuing education in Southern Brazil
Main Article Content
Abstract
The pandemic caused by Covid-19 has caused education, on a global scale, to face increasing challenges in considerable aspects, from the social and economic inequality of students and teachers to the so-called learning deficit at all levels. Considering the essential dialogue between the university, through its teacher education courses and the basic education school, an applied research project was developed (participatory action research) whose theme presupposes technological innovation from a double perspective, as a means and an end. Means, through the proposed teaching methodology, integrated with technology with a view to changes and innovation in the work processes of basic education teachers when implemented. End, considering the pedagogical products generated after implementing the methodology, digital learning objects that, by nature, encompass different technologies for learning purposes. Furthermore, through the effective participation of teachers linked to the action research proposal, the results suggest the effectiveness of teaching resignification, made possible by continuing education, regarding their role as mediators and curators of the pedagogical process, aware that their knowledge of teacher involves the content, pedagogical and technological dimensions, as well as the role of information and communication technologies as an integral part of their pedagogical work.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Alteridad" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
Bower, M., Lister, R., Mason, R., Highfield, K. y Wood, L. (2015). Teacher conceptions of computational thinking - implications for policy and practice. Australian Journal of Education, 0(0), 2015, 1-16.
Daniels, H. (2016). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617602
Dorigon, T. C. y Romanowski, J. P. (2008). A Reflexao em Dewey e Schon. Revista Intersaberes, 3(5), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.22169/revint.v3i5.123
Duncan, C., Bell, T. y Atlas, J. (2017). What do the teachers think? Introducing computational thinking in the Primary School Curriculum. Proceeding ACE’2017- Proceedings of the Nineteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference, Geelong, VIC, Australia, 65-74.
García, G. G., Jiménez, C. R. y Marín, J. A. M. (2020). La trascendencia de la Realidad Aumentada en la motivación estudiantil. Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis. Alteridad, 15(1). https://bit.ly/3z9l0yA
García-Lázaro, D. y Martin-Neto, R. (2023). Competencia matemática y digital del futuro docente mediante el uso de GeoGebra. Alteridad, 18(1), https://bit.ly/3xou564
Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Computadores, ferramentas cognitivas: Desenvolver o pensamento crítico nas escolas. Porto Editora.
Kurtz, F. D. y Silva, D. R. (2018). Tecnologias de Informacao e Comunicacao (TICs) como ferramentas cognitivas na formacao de professores. Contexto e educacao, 33, 5-32. https://bit.ly/3VMakyQ
Kurtz, F. D. y Silva, D. R. (2020). ICT, Media and Education: some considerations from the Brazilian scenario. Annales Educatio Nova-UMCS Sectio N, 5, 487-501. https://bit.ly/3Vu1gNx
Kurtz, F. D., Silva, D. R. y Krajka, J. (2021). Rethinking innovation in education from a crosscultural perspective: the role performed by digital information and communication technologies (DICT) in pedagogy change. Humanidades & Inovacao, 8, 114-131. https://bit.ly/45sqWip
Kurtz, F. D., Machado, G. J. C. y Johann, M. R. (orgs.) (2022). Educacao, linguagens e tecnologia. Ilustracao.
Kurtz, F. D. (org.) (2023). Escolas Inteligentes: explorando possibilidades de inovacao no processo pedagógico em contexto híbrido. Metrics.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. y Pearson, L. B. F. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: an argument for AI in Education. https://bit.ly/45vmJu5
Maureira-Cabrera, O., Vásquez-Astudillo, M., Garrido-Valdenegro, F. y Olivares-Silva, M. J. (2020). Evaluación y coevaluación de aprendizajes en blended learning en educación superior. Alteridad, 15(2). https://bit.ly/3xqz2eQ
Mishra, P. y Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Moraes, R. y Galiazzi, M. do C. (2020). Análise Textual Discursiva (2nd ed.). Unijuí.
Ouyang, F., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y. y Yang, Y. (2021). In-service teachers’ knowledge building during face-to-face collaborative learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103479
Popandopulo, A., Fominykh, N. y Kudysheva, A. (2021). Do educators need metacognitive skills in today’s educational environment? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100878
Reyes-Cabrera, W. (2022). Gamificación y aprendizaje colaborativo en línea: un análisis de estrategias en una universidad mexicana. Alteridad, 17(1). https://bit.ly/4c56C9j
Schon, D. A. (2000). Educando o profissional reflexivo: Um novo design para o ensino e a aprendizagem (1a ed.). Artmed.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1). https://bit.ly/4ex4M2o
Shulman, L. (1992). Research on teaching: a historical and personal perspective. En F. Oser, A. Dick y J. Patry (eds.), Effective and Responsible Teaching (pp. 14-29). Jossey-Bass.
Silva, D. R. (2020). Desenvolvimento do pensamento computacional como dimensao estruturante da atividade do professor de cursos superiores de computacao. 182 f. UNIJUÍ-RS. https://bit.ly/3KMubaS
Silva, D. R., Kurtz, F. D. y Pansera de Araújo, M. C. (2024). Metacognition and computational thinking in Vygotsky’s historical-cultural perspective. Espaco Pedagógico, 30(1). https://bit.ly/3xkYdPT
Tardif, M., Lessard, C. y Lahaye, L. (1991). Os professores face ao saber: esboco de uma problemática do saber docente. Teoria & Educacao, Pannonica.
Tardif, M. (2010) Saberes docentes e formacao profissional. Vozes.
Tardif, M. y Lessard, C. (2013) O ofício de professor: história, perspectivas e desafios internacionais. 5. ed., Vozes.
van Huizen, P., van Oers, B. y Wubbels, T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 267-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027042000328468
Vygotsky, L. S. (2007). A formacao social da mente: o desenvolvimento dos processos psicológicos superiores. Martins Fontes.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2008). Pensamento e Linguagem. Martins Fontes.
Wang, W., Kang, W. y Mu, J. (2023). Mapping research to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 19 February 2023, Preprint (Version 2). Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2544385/v2
Wertsch, J. V. (1988). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26071b0
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Computer Mediation, PBL, and dialogicality. Distance Education, 23(1), 105-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910220124008
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. Social Issues in Computing- Academic Press. https://bit.ly/4esbZkm
Zeng, Y., Wang, Y. y Li, S. (2022). The relationship between teachers’ information technology integration self-efficacy and TPACK: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1091017