Educational frontiers with ChatGPT: a social network analysis of influential tweets
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The unprecedented adoption of OpenAI's ChatGPT, marked by reaching 100 million daily users in early 2023, highlights the growing interest in AI for educational improvement. This research aims to analyze the initial public reception and educational impacts of ChatGPT, using social network analysis of the 100 most influential tweets. Using the ForceAtlas2 algorithm and thematic content analysis, the study explores the appeal of ChatGPT and its prospects as an educational tool. The findings underscore ChatGPT's potential to revolutionize teaching methods, facilitate personalized learning, and bridge gaps in access to quality education. In addition, the analysis sheds light on ChatGPT's role in promoting critical thinking and interactive learning, its utility in creating educational content, and its ability to enhance teacher-student interactions. These findings point to a shift toward AI-enhanced education and argue for the integration of ChatGPT and similar technologies into learning environments. The discussion argues for empirical research on the educational impact of ChatGPT and urges a cautious approach to its adoption. It highlights the need for frameworks that harness the power of ChatGPT while addressing ethical and practical challenges. Finally, this study describes the initial reception of ChatGPT and highlights its transformative potential in education. It calls for strategic AI integration to optimize educational processes, and emphasizes the importance of continued research to navigate the evolving role of AI in learning.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Alteridad" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
Alharbi, A. S. M., & de Doncker, E. (2019). Twitter sentiment analysis with a deep neural network: An enhanced approach using user behavioral information. Cognitive Systems Research, 54, 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.001
Barber, M., Bird, L., Fleming, J., Titterington-Giles, E., Edwards, E., and Leyland, C. (2021). “Gravity assist: Propelling higher education towards a brighter future” Office for students. Available online at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/gravity-assist-propelling-higher-education-towards-abrighter-future/
Battisti, E., Graziano, E. A., & Christofi, M. (2022). Equity crowdfunding platforms and social media: a Twitter analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(5), 1206-1221. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0081
Bian, J., Yoshigoe, K., Hicks, A., Yuan, J., He, Z., Xie, M., ... & Modave, F. (2016). Mining Twitter to assess the public perception of the “Internet of Things”. PloS One, 11(7), e0158450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158450
Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage, 1998.
Camacho, D., Luzón, M. V., & Cambria, E. (2021). New research methods & algorithms in social network analysis. Future Generation Computer Systems, 114, 290-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.08.006
Carpenter, J., Tani, T., Morrison, S., & Keane, J. (2020). Exploring the landscape of educator professional activity on Twitter: An analysis of 16 education-related Twitter hashtags. Professional Development in Education, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1752287
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647028
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Firat, M. (2023a). How Chat GPT Can Transform Autodidactic Experiences and Open Education?. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9ge8m
Firat, M. (2023b). Integrating AI Applications into Learning Management Systems to Enhance e-Learning. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 4 (1), 1-14 . https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1244453
Grant, N. & Metz, C. (2022). A New Chat Bot Is a ‘Code Red’ for Google’s Search Business. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/21/technology/ai-chatgpt-google-search.html
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M. (2019). Polarization and acculturation in US Election 2016 outcomes–Can twitter analytics predict changes in voting preferences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 438-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.009
Guan, C., Mou, J., & Jiang, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A Twenty-year data-driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(4), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001
Haque, M. U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z. T., Rajapakse, R. N., & Ahmad, H. (2022). "I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.05856. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05856
Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 30-50. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software. PLoS ONE 9(6), e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2011). The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging. Business Horizons, 54(2), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.004
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010, April). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 591-600). https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751
Lewis, A. (2022). “Multimodal large language models for inclusive collaboration learning tasks.” Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Student Research Workshop, 202-210. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-srw.26
Li, C., & Xing, W. (2021). “Natural language generation using deep learning to support MOOC learners.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(2): 186-214. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40593-020-00235-x
Li, M., Turki, N., Izaguirre, C. R., DeMahy, C., Thibodeaux, B. L., & Gage, T. (2021). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3), 854-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22324
Lu, Y., & Zheng, Q. (2021). Twitter public sentiment dynamics on cruise tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(7), 892-898. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1843607
Newman, M. E. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056131. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056131
Noack, A. (2009). Modularity clustering is force-directed layout. Physical Review E, 79(2), 026102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.026102
OpenAI, (2023). Chat GPT. Retrieved from https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ on 2 January 2023.
Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature machine intelligence, 1(5), 206-215. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-019-0048-x
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Serrat, O. (2017). Social network analysis. Knowledge solutions: Tools, methods, and approaches to drive organizational performance, 39-43. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_9
Sier, J. (2022) Chatgpt takes the internet by storm, bad poetry and all. Accessed December 10, 2022. https://www.afr.com/technology/ chatgpt-takes-the-internet-by-storm-bad-poetry-and-all-20221207-p5c4hv
Taecharungroj, V. (2023). “What Can ChatGPT Do?” Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010035
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
Yogatama, A., Sugiarto, I., & Gumelar, A. B. (2022). Social Network Analysis of Citizen Initiated Vaccination Campaigns on Twitter. In International Conference on Community Empowerment and Engagement (ICCEE 2021) (pp. 122-132). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220501.014
Zhuo, T. Y., Huang, Y., Chen, C., & Xing, Z. (2023). Exploring ai ethics of ChatGPT: A diagnostic analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12867. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.12867