Universal Design for Learning in the configuration of inclusive practices among university lecturers in Ecuador
Main Article Content
Abstract
The growing diversity of students in university classrooms is a reality that intensifies year after year. This scenario makes the teaching staff a fundamental agent in promoting truly inclusive education that favours meaningful and quality learning. This study aims to identify the educational practices of teachers at a public university in Ecuador and determine whether they are aligned with the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework. A quantitative, descriptive-exploratory study was conducted, using a survey to collect data from a sample of 123 teachers from 23 university degree programmes. The results show that the most established practices are related to curriculum planning, the use of participatory strategies, and the use of virtual environments. However, weaknesses were identified in the diversification of content formats, formative assessment, and the creation of affective spaces and openness to dialogue, suggesting opportunities for improvement in the construction of inclusive environments and in teacher training. Teachers' perceptions of institutional preparedness to address diversity are critical, pointing to the need to strengthen inclusive policies and institutional support. It is concluded that the DUA is an effective framework for guiding educational transformation and that teachers and students should be considered key actors in building more inclusive universities.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Alteridad" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
Antón, J. (2020). Etnicidad y educación en Ecuador: la población afrodescendiente e inclusión escolar en Ecuador. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374764
Ainscow, M. (2024). Desarrollo de escuelas inclusivas: Caminos hacia el éxito. Routledge
Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: lessons from international experiences. The Nordic Journal of Studies on Educational Policy, 6(1), 7-16. org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
Ainscow, M., y Messiou, K. (2018). Engaging with the views of students to promote inclusion in education. Journal of educational change, 19(1), 1-17. http://doi: 10.1007/s10833-017-9312-1
Alba-Pastor, C. (2019). Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje: un modelo teórico-práctico para una educación inclusiva de calidad. Participación y mejora educativa, 6(9), 55-68. http://tinyurl.com/2k5v2yjh
Arias-García, M. F., Arnaiz-Sánchez, P., y De Haro Rodríguez, R. (2024). Análisis del liderazgo ejercido por los equipos directivos para fomentar una comunidad educativa inclusiva. International Journal of New Education, 13, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.24310/ijne.13.2024.19660
Arnaiz-Sánchez, P., Alcaraz, S., y Caballero, C.M. (2024). Significados atribuidos a la educación inclusiva por la comunidad educativa. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 27(3), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.617101
Barrera, M., Márquez C., Sánchez, S. y Moliner, O. (2025). Movilizando el DUA: recomendaciones tecnológicas para la inclusión desde los servicios de apoyo de universidades españolas. Aula Abierta, 54(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.20815
Bisquerra, R. (2004). Metodología de la investigación educativa. Editorial La Muralla.
CAST (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. Center for Applied Special Technology. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/about-guidelines-3-0/
Castellano-Beltrán, A., Moriña, A. y Carballo, R. (2024). La Tecnología Educativa como Herramienta Inclusiva para los Estudiantes con Discapacidad: Experiencias de Profesores Universitarios Españoles. Revista Brasileira de Educaçao Especial, 30(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-54702024v30e0180
Canabal, C., y Margalef, L. (2017). La retroalimentación: La clave para una evaluación orientada al aprendizaje. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 21(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v21i2.10329
Diaz-Vega, M., Moreno-Rodríguez, R. y López-Bastías, J. L. (2020). Educational inclusion through the universal design for learning: Alternatives to teacher training. Education Sciences, 10(11). 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110303
Espada-Chavarria, R., González-Montesino, R.H., López-Bastías, J.L. y Díaz-Vega, M. (2023). Universal design for learning and instruction: Effective strategies for inclusive higher education. Education Sciences 13(6) 1-14. doi:10.3390/educsci13060620.
Florian, L. y Beaton, M. (2018). Inclusive pedagogy in action: getting it right for every child. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(8), 870-884. http://doi: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1412513
Garrad, T.A. and H. Nolan. 2023. Rethinking higher education unit design: Embedding universal design for learning in online studies. Student Success 14 (1) ,1-8. doi:10.5204/ssj.2300.
Global Education Monitoring Report Team (2023). SDG 4 mid-term progress review: progress since 2015 has been far too slow. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/NLOV8340
Healy, R., Banks, J. y Ryder, D. (2023). “Universal design for learning policy in tertiary education in Ireland: Are we ready to commit?” In J.W. Madaus and L.L. Dukes III (Eds.), Handbook of higher education and disability (pp. 392–405). Edward Elgar Publishing
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., y Baptista-Lucio, M. P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Iniesto, F. y Bossu, C. (2023). Equidad, diversidad e inclusión en la educación abierta: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Educación a Distancia, 44 (4), 694–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2267472
Ley Orgánica Reformatoria a la Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior, LOES. R.O. N.º. 297, Suplemento, de 02 de agosto de 2018. https://www.ces.gob.ec/documentos/Normativa/LOES.pdf
López-Bastías, J. L., Moreno-Rodríguez, R. y Diaz-Vega, M. (2020). Attention to the special educational needs of university students with disabilities: the CAUSSEN tool as part of the educational inclusion process. Culture and Education 32 (1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1705563
Messiou, K. (2019). Las voces ausentes: el alumnado como catalizador para promover la educación inclusiva. Revista Internacional de Educación Inclusiva, 23 (7-8), 768-781. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1623326
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., y Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: Center for Applied Special Tecnology, CAST
Moriña, A., Carballo, R. y Doménech, A. (2025). Transforming higher education: a systematic review of faculty training in UDL and its benefits. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2025.2465994
Okai-Ugbaje, S., Ardzejewska, K. y Imran, A. (2022). A mobile learning framework for higher education in resource constrained environments. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11947-11969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11094-5
Ortiz-Moya, N.G., Ríos, M.B, Santillan, N., Veintimilla, L.E. y Morillo, G. A. (2025). Impacto de la diversidad e inclusión en el rendimiento académico de la educación superior. Revista InveCom, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12639443
Porto, A.M. (2022). Percepción del alumnado y profesorado universitario sobre la accesibilidad y la inclusión. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 28(1), 1-16. http://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v28i1.23673
Roco-Videla, Á., Flores, S., Olguin-Barraza, M., y Maureira-Carsalade, N. (2024). Alpha de cronbach y su intervalo de confianza. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 41(1), 270-271. https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.04961
Sánchez, S. y Alvear, V. (2024, noviembre). Pautas de Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje (versión 3.0). ON Inclusion. Grupo de Innovación, Diversidad y Formación Docente Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. https://www.oninclusion.es/pautas-de-diseno-universal-para-el-aprendizaje/
Sánchez Fuentes, S. y Duk, C. (2022). La importancia del entorno. Diseño universal para el aprendizaje contextualizado. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 16(2), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782022000200021
Stefos, E. y Chávez, C. (2023). Educational gaps in Ecuador: The case of the university-educated population. Revista Scientific, 8(28), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2023.8.28.12.230-244
UNESCO. 2015. Education 2030. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. UNESCO.
UNESCO. 2025. (21 de febrero de 2025). Qué debe saber acerca de la inclusión en la educación https://www.unesco.org/es/inclusion-education/need-know
Varela, C. y Dans, I. (2024). Evaluación innovadora en Educación Superior. Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje, 17(33), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v17i33.4497